Movie Mom

Movie Mom

The Green Hornet

posted by Nell Minow
B-
Lowest Recommended Age:High School
MPAA Rating:Rated PG-13 for sequences of violent action, language, sensuality, and drug content
Profanity:Strong language for a PG-13
Nudity/Sex:Some sexual references and non-explicit situations
Alcohol/Drugs:Drinking, drug dealers, meth lab
Violence/Scariness:Extended comic book/fantasy violence with brief graphic images, characters injured and killed
Diversity Issues:Diverse characters
Movie Release Date:January 14, 2011
DVD Release Date:May 3, 2011

Anyone here remember Van Williams?

He was the star of the 1966-67 television series, “The Green Hornet.” But the only thing anyone remembers about the show today was the actor who played the title character’s martial arts and automotive expert sidekick, Kato: Bruce Lee. The tradition continues with this new film. Jay Chou (“Curse of the Golden Flower”) has the screen charisma, timing, and fight skills to make Kato watchable. That guy who plays the Hornet? Not so much.

 

In fact, the three things wrong with this movie are: Seth Rogen co-produced, Seth Rogen co-wrote, and Seth Rogen stars. Seth Rogen the co-producer and writer badly over-estimates the appeal of Rogen the performer. When called upon to play a clueless schlub, he can convey a certain shambling lack of pretension or artifice with some appeal. He was perfect as the brainless jello character in “Monsters vs. Aliens” and held his own fairly well as a secondary character in “Funny People,” “Superbad,” and “Knocked Up.” He may have some meta aspirations in casting himself as a self-indulgent and irresponsible playboy who decides to become a force for justice. But he doesn’t even make a persuasive dissolute. When he tries to do more, he loses all of the affection from the audience he ever mustered in playing guys who were better than they knew. Here is is so much less than his character believes to be and is supposed to be, he comes across as full of himself and egotistical; it’s as though his success in Hollywood and his hyphenate status have finally gone to his head. And even though he apparently recognizes his limited range by reducing the character arc to about an inch and a half; even after Britt decides to become a sort-of grown-up and a sort-of crime-fighter, Rogen the writer and Rogen the actor keep him pretty much an immature dope all the way through. It wears thin long before the movie is half over.

 

It also drags down the parts of the film that do work, especially Chou, whose precise, understated delivery is a nice counterpoint to Rogen’s messy stumbles. Michel Gondry (“Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind,” “Be Kind, Rewind”) has a gift for whimsy that adds visual interest. An impossibly souped-up supercar has an old-fashioned turntable for playing disarmingly retro LPs. He slices up the screen into segments resembling something between “The Thomas Crown Affair,” the opening credits of “The Brady Bunch,” and that Breck shampoo commercial about “and they they told two people and they told two people.” And he makes good use of the depth of 3D in the fight scenes. We get Kato-vision to see how he sizes up the opposition, with a clever variation later on. Oscar-winner Christoph Waltz (“Inglourious Basterds”) manages to make more of the villain than the script gives him and there’s a nice cameo from the ubiquitous James Franco (giving us time to think that he would make a great Hornet).

Rogen is falling into the Adam Sandler/Peter Pan trap, the endless boy-man, alternately wolfish toward and intimidated by girls (Cameron Diaz has the thankless role) and incapable of taking responsibility at home or at work. At one point, Kato literally puts him in a diaper. The only reason to give the audience such a mess is so we can have the fun of seeing him learn some lessons. But he never does. This is a hornet that’s all buzz, no sting.

Parents should know that this movie includes a great deal of comic-book fantasy violence with many characters injured and killed, brief graphic images, death of a parent, drinking, drug dealers, sexual references and non-explicit situation, very strong language for a PG-13.

 

Family discussion: How does this film differ from other superhero movies? Why does Britt change his mind about his father at the end of the film?

 

If you like this, try: the “Green Hornet” television series starring Bruce Lee



You Might Also Like...
Previous Posts

Linda Holmes: Where Are the Women in Movies?
Linda Holmes of NPR's Monkey See blog has written a piece that is more than the usual "Why aren't there more women in/making movies?" There are 617 movie showings today — that's just today, Friday — within 10 miles of my house. Of those 617 showings, 561 of them — 90 percent — are storie

posted 3:59:07pm Jun. 18, 2013 | read full post »

Claire LaZebnik Remembers A Visit from Patricia Neal
Claire LaZebnik wrote a beautiful piece in the Wall Street Journal about a visit from the late Oscar-winning actress Patricia Neal.  The first movie I ever reviewed -- for my high school paper -- was Neal's comeback film, "The Subject Was Roses" (with a very young Martin Sheen as her son).  Neal

posted 8:00:26am Jun. 18, 2013 | read full post »

Opening This Week: World War Z and Monsters University
It's one of the biggest weeks of the year at the movies with two huge openings.  It's the zombie apocalypse vs. monsters, Brad Pitt vs. Mike and Sully. Pitt stars in a movie based on World War Z, a book by Max Brooks (son of Oscar-winners Anne Bancroft and Mel Brooks).  It is directed by Marc F

posted 3:59:28pm Jun. 17, 2013 | read full post »

Contest: Jack the Giant Slayer -- and An Exclusive Look at the New "Jack the Giant Slayer" Game for Kids
I really enjoyed Jack the Giant Slayer, next week's DVD/Blu-Ray Pick of the Week, and I am very excited to have five copies to give away.  Send me an email at moviemom@moviemom.com with "Jack" in the subject line, and tell me your favorite fairy tale.  Don't forget your address!  (US addresses on

posted 7:00:23am Jun. 17, 2013 | read full post »

Quiz: Father's Day Movies
How many of these can you identify? 1. This movie is based on the true story of a pioneering "motion study" couple (efficiency, occupational safety, and ergonomics) engineer who brought their techniques to family life. 2. What movie has a widower with a young son who almost marries the wrong w

posted 3:35:25pm Jun. 16, 2013 | read full post »

Advertisement
Comments read comments(5)
post a comment
Joanie

posted January 16, 2011 at 2:23 am


Hi again, Nell, as usual, it looks like you may have saved me some bucks. My (very conservative) kids were offended by the trailer although I still wanted to see the movie and hoped that it would not be as bad as advertised. Looks like the trailer was on point. How bad are the sexual scenes?



report abuse
 

Nell Minow

posted January 16, 2011 at 9:36 am


Thanks, Joanie. The sexual material is brief and pretty mild for a PG-13 (though pretty juvenile). No nudity or explicit sexual situations.



report abuse
 

Joanie

posted January 17, 2011 at 3:21 am


Thanks! The kids are not intersted now because their peers are telling them it’s stupid. But I’m not convinced. I might just go check it out alone. I like the action flicks. Funny thing is that they rely on you so much! When I asked them to go to “True Grit” today, they said “What did Movie Mom give it?” because they hadn’t seen anything about it. I said “She gave it A minus” and showed them the trailer. They went and loved the story. Thanks Nell! You are doing the work of many parents!



report abuse
 

LLP

posted January 24, 2011 at 10:18 am


Alas, you were far too generous with the B- rating! This was the worst movie I’ve seen in years. I have to admit that, while my expectations weren’t particularly high, I did hold out some hope that the movie would have some entertaining bits…I mean, the trailers looked (sorta) funny, and I’ve sat through stuporhero movies with my kids that I usually find something to enjoy. This time? NOT!! Some of the car gadgets might have been cool if they hadn’t virtually all been done before and if our (major-league annoying) hero didn’t keep beating us over the head with exclamations of just how cool they were supposed to be. Instead, I only found myself wanting it to be over and seriously ticked off that we’d wasted extra money on the unadvertised 3D headache, especially when the movie was devoid of other effects to merit 3D cinematography.



report abuse
 

George

posted January 24, 2011 at 6:44 pm


Hello there. I just want to say that I wish I had read your review before going to see this movie last night. I took my 2 HS-aged boys and squirmed in my seat because of all the profanity. My elder boy mentioned the profanity first thing after we left. I also agree with the person who stated that the 3D was pretty lame. We saw it in 3D IMAX and paid the premium. I agree it was not worth it. I would discourage anyone from seeing this movie. It was weak.



report abuse
 

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.





Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.